Stipe, Soup, and Manolos

Michael Stipe, the ambiguously gay lead singer of REM, spent almost twenty years refusing to identify his sexuality to curious fans and reporters. In 1994, Stipe said in an interview that he didn't believe in labeling humans, that "labels are for soup cans." He eventually came out of the closet, and much like the news reports when Clay Aiken and Lance Bass came out, the revelation was about as shocking as learning that Christmas is in December.

It's ironic to me to consider that such an observation concerning human sexuality came from a gay guy. Gay guys love and adore labels and very rarely do we refuse to acknowledge them. Aside from our obvious affection towards designer fashion labels, gay men can label one another within millions of classifications and sub-categories. We can be twinks, bears, daddies, jocks, art house gays, retail queens, bar trash, bottoms, tops, self-hating, on the down low, activist gays, queeny, or butch. We can be a Garland Gay (aged 60+), a Streisand Gay (aged 40 - 59), a Madonna / Cher Gay (aged 25 - 39), or a Britney Gay (aged 25 and under). We can be the type of gay guy that likes to go camping (the lesbian gay) or we can be the type of gay guy that likes to vacation in urban cities with large gay populations (the normal gay). So, in my opinion, when Michael Stipe made his famous soup can label comment, he must've been in the throws of a full-on debilitating case of denial towards his own homosexuality. No gay man in his right mind would ever suggest that we as a group NOT label one another. Like being self-centered and witty, labeling things just comes naturally to us.

A particular labeling fondness of the gay guy is to relate themselves and their friends to the characters of very gay friendly shows like "The Golden Girls," "Will and Grace," or "Sex and the City." Both shows were mainstream successes, enjoyed by straight women everywhere and even a few ashamed heterosexual men. But given that all three shows were written primarily by gay men, the themes throughout each and the basic qualities of their main characters are things that gay guys often directly identify with. Not once since "The Golden Girls" began airing in 1985 has a group of gay guy friends NOT sat around and debated on which one among them was the Blanche (the self-centered slut), or the Dorothy (the cynical intellectual), or the Rose (the naive but kind idiot), or the Sophia (the caregiver). You can take quizzes online to determine if you're the Will or the Grace or the Jack or the Karen. And every group of gay friends on EARTH has had a conversation over Cosmopolitans as to who among them is the Samantha, the Charlotte, the Miranda, or the Carrie.

Two weeks ago I set out on the drive from Chicago to Memphis, heading home for the holidays. Thanks to a craptastic winter storm, what was supposed to be an eight hour drive turned into a two day journey, meaning that I had A LOT of time to think about my life and further dissect the typical thoughts and observations that we all experience around Christmas and the New Year. I have found myself recently in a romantic situation that is foreign to me. As anyone who spares the ten minutes to read this blog every few weeks clearly knows, I have been through just about every relationship quandary you can think of. I have dated people out of boredom. I have been pity f*cked. I've been dumped via a Facebook Relationship Status Change. I have dated more than one guy at a time. I've been mad, sad, elated, selfish, hopeful. You name it and I've been there, on either side of the coin. But lately I've been treading new territory. I am spending a great deal of time with someone who makes me feel like wearing a ballerina outfit as a bus drives by with my picture on it and splashes water all over me. I am starting to hear myself speak in a voiceover, saying things like, "Meanwhile, across town," and, "It suddenly occurred to me." Well, it suddenly occurred to me, sitting in my car somewhere between Chicago and St. Louis (after having crept slowly down an icy interstate for almost six hours), that I was Carrie Bradshaw, enamored and confused by my own Mr. Big. Da da da da. Da da. Da da da da da! Let's do brunch with the girls!

I could trump a room full of a million gay guys who would label themselves as a Carrie with my current situation. All of the key elements are present. I am hanging out with an older successful gentleman (after almost three months, we are not yet allowed to call it dating). I'm artistic, care-free, in my early thirties. He's established, handsome, driven, in his early forties, the target of many boys younger and cuter than me. He's comfortable moving at a snail's pace, in no hurry to jump into another relationship that will more likely than not end with someone getting very hurt. Although slightly jaded, I am still a relationship idealist. I believe that there's still a chance for me with someone. He doesn't care if I date anyone else. Our time together is generally spent with us alone, so my friends know very little about him. And what slight information I give them consists mostly of my confused ramblings about what he wants, what I want, and our inconsistency with how we treat one another leaves my friends with a less than favorable opinion of a man they barely know. When I try to explain to my friends what I'm doing with him (which is basically impossible because I don't know), they stare at me with concerned looks on their faces. All that is missing from this "Sex and the City" playbook is shopping for shoes, the New York skyline, and cute (although ridiculous) puns.

Like Carrie towards her Mr. Big, I find myself uber-emotional around my Mr. Big. I think I want him to want me, but when something happens that gets us closer to that point I start drifting away. Would it be easier with someone else? Is there a furniture designer or a writer out there that I should be dating instead? Will he dump me and marry someone prettier and younger than me? Will I meet an older Russian artist and move to Paris? Or, like what happens to Carrie in the movie, will he leave me at the alter? Will he come back? Could I ever be happy with him? Will asking myself all these f*cking questions eventually drive me crazy?

Before I moved to Chicago, I studied "Sex and the City" with intensity. Sure, those ladies never seemed to get it right until the very end of the series, but didn't they look great? And didn't it seem like they were having fun despite all of their relationship shortcomings? My friend John who lives in New York is working on a book about how the popularity of shows like "Sex and the City" were inspiring people, particularly gay guys and single women, to haul ass to large cities like New York and Chicago. I guess I was like that. I wanted so badly to walk amongst the crowds in a busy city street, to have party invitations coming out of my ass, to date constantly, to f*ck everything that walked, to meet up with my stylish, fun, smart friends once a week and wax philosophically on our sophisticated lives in the big city. And I guess that happened, that I got what I wanted in regards to that, but that life, that lack of something solid beyond your friendships to lean on, got old for Carrie and the girls after six seasons. 2009 marks my sixth year in Chicago.

I love Michael Stipe. He was, in all honesty, the first male celebrity I was ever attracted to. He was by no means nothing to look at, but when I was sixteen years old I was so impressed and moved by his brilliance with words and the way he flaunted being misunderstood by society as opposed to being ashamed of it. That really turned me on at a point in my life when I felt like everyone in the world could see right through me. I remember looking at the picture of him shirtless, in water, in the lyrics insert of REM's "Automatic for the People" CD. He moved me to the point that I had re-occurring dreams of him throughout college, dreams that generally consisted of he and I being married. I used to touch myself inappropriately if I was alone when the video for "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?" came on MTV. My point is that I took his soup can observation to heart. I took all of his observations and actions to heart. Stipe made me proud to be a liberal Democrat in Mississippi. Stipe made me proud of my own opinions and proud to express them. It wasn't until my late twenties, well after REM had fallen out of fashion, that I realized that labels are not, as he'd proposed, meant solely for soup cans. Labels CAN be applied to people. And sometimes they should. Because once you're able to solidly identify someone as something, it helps you in maneuvering your behavior around them.

So what if I am a Carrie Bradshaw? I think that's a label I'm comfortable with. Carrie never once strayed from the idea of what she wanted out of a relationship. She wanted safety and comfort and humor and honesty and friendship and sexual compatability. Although it took Mr. Big six years to figure out that he wanted the same things, Carrie never stopped moving. She kept her eye on the prize, so to speak. And the prize was not a man. The prize was her being happy.

My apologies to Mr. Stipe. I still love him (although he's aged so horribly). But I'm fine with being tagged yet another label at 33 years old. I'm a Carrie. And that's quite the badge of honor. Carrie never waited on a Mr. Big to make her happy, and I won't either. It wasn't until Carrie fully believed in her own ability to fulfill herself that Mr. Big finally came around. When you come to terms with yourself, your own skin, your own shortcomings and your own talents, good things and good peole have a way of gravitating towards you.

Meanwhile, across town...